Court Rejects Executive Order
A federal judge in Washington invalidated Trump’s order targeting children of parents without permanent legal status. Judge John Coughenour ruled that the 14th Amendment protects birthright citizenship, making the executive order unconstitutional.
The judge described the case as straightforward and imposed a 14-day injunction. Trump, however, announced plans to appeal the decision. Meanwhile, 22 states, along with several cities and civil rights groups, have already filed lawsuits to challenge the policy.
Experts: Citizenship Change Requires Constitutional Amendment
Legal experts argue that the 14th Amendment cannot be altered by executive action. Changing it would demand a constitutional amendment, requiring a two-thirds majority in Congress and approval from 38 states—a highly challenging process.
Trump inaccurately stated that the U.S. is unique in offering birthright citizenship. In reality, countries like Canada, Mexico, and others have similar policies. Germany also grants citizenship to children of foreign nationals under specific conditions, such as the parents’ long-term legal residency.
Mexico Braces for Deportations
Trump’s order aligns with his broader immigration agenda, which includes large-scale deportations and a national emergency declaration at the southern border. To support enforcement, Trump deployed 1,500 additional troops to the region.
In response, Mexican officials began preparing for an influx of deportees. Authorities in Matamoros set up facilities to house 3,000 people. Nationwide, 12 reception centers are planned, including three for non-Mexican migrants, as part of an initiative called “Mexico Embraces You.”
The court’s decision represents a major obstacle for Trump’s immigration policies. Ongoing legal battles will determine the future of birthright citizenship and broader migration reforms in the U.S.